<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>BLOGWITHOUTALIBRARY.NET &#187; survey</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogwithoutalibrary.net/tag/survey/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogwithoutalibrary.net</link>
	<description>libraries, technology, UX, &#38;c.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 21:37:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>a long-overdue update on the special library 2.0 survey</title>
		<link>http://www.blogwithoutalibrary.net/251</link>
		<comments>http://www.blogwithoutalibrary.net/251#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 18:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ae-j</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[op-ed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[talk/teach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speciallibrary2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[survey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogwithoutalibrary.net/?p=251</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Back, way back, in November, I put up a little survey asking about the use of 2.0 tools in special libraries and 68 of you kindly responded. I hope it&#8217;s not too late to say, thank you all for being so very obliging! There&#8217;s a category on the Blogging Libraries Wiki devoted to special libraries, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back, <em><a href="http://www.blogwithoutalibrary.net/?p=236">way back</a></em>, in November, I put up a little survey asking about the use of 2.0 tools in special libraries and 68 of you kindly responded. I hope it&#8217;s not too late to say, <em>thank you all</em> for being so very obliging! There&#8217;s a category on the <a href="http://www.blogwithoutalibrary.net/links/">Blogging Libraries Wiki</a> devoted to <a href="http://www.blogwithoutalibrary.net/links/index.php?title=Special_libraries">special libraries</a>, but it&#8217;s probably the most under-used page on there, and I know that the lack of links on that page is not an accurate representation of the use of tools like blogs by these institutions*, so it was a real thrill to read about all the interesting ways librarians are putting 2.0 tools to work in special libraries!</p>
<p>* <small>blogs, wikis, etc. in special libraries tend to be used internally, therefore there&#8217;s really no linking to them; I&#8217;d love to come up with a way to gather this information in the wiki anyway, but I haven&#8217;t put a lot of thought into that yet. Plus, I love the <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/nengard/sets/1752482/">flickr set</a> <a href="http://www.web2learning.net/">Nicole</a> put up, with screenshots of the very 2.0 intranet she built, so perhaps Flickr is the way to go anyway.</small></p>
<p>So, I asked the following four questions in the survey:</p>
<ol>
<li>What type of library do you work in?</li>
<li>What 2.0 tools do you use in your library? (the options were: blogs, wikis, RSS, instant messaging, social bookmarking (e.g.: del.icio.us), and &#8220;other&#8221;)</li>
<li>Tell me a bit about how you use 2.0 tools in your library. e.g.: if you have a blog, what do you use it for?</li>
<li>Can you comment on any issues you might have had while implementing these tools? e.g.: firewall issues, staff buy-in, etc.</li>
</ol>
<p>Here are the responses. The first two questions are represented graphically, and for the last two questions, I grabbed a number of excerpts from the responses (stripped of all identifying info).</p>
<p><strong>1. What type of library do you work in?</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/etches-johnson/328300447/" title="what type of library do you work in?"><img src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/137/328300447_800d0bb900.jpg" width="385" height="239" alt="what type of library do you work in?" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/etches-johnson/328300436/" title="who are the others?"><img src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/130/328300436_7768eb1fc0.jpg" width="385" height="274" alt="who are the others?" /></a></p>
<p><strong>2. What 2.0 tools do you use in your library?</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/etches-johnson/328300412/" title="what 2.0 tools do you use in your library?"><img src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/142/328300412_93dd871294.jpg" width="385" height="324" alt="what 2.0 tools do you use in your library?" /></a></p>
<p><strong>3. Tell me a bit about how you use 2.0 tools in your library. e.g.: if you have a blog, what do you use it for?</strong><br />
Check out some of these incredible uses (a gold mine of good ideas here):</p>
<ul>
<li>An internal blog where we try to share some of the research gems we find</li>
<li>A what&#8217;s-new-in-the-library blog</li>
<li>Experimenting with the idea of embedding federal government RSS feeds into resource guides for our executive departments using feed2js</li>
<li>Social bookmarking for internal reference stuff</li>
<li>Use IM constantly for collaboration internally and externally …It is business critical. </li>
<li>A wiki/blog as another means to communicate news and information internally in our library. </li>
<li>RSS is used but little understood</li>
<li>Encourage doctors to use RSS feeds to stay up to date with their favorite journals. I help them create searches on PubMed that are saved as RSS feeds.</li>
<li>We use a wiki for reference service.</li>
<li>Wikis for compiling results of large group research projects.</li>
<li>Personalized RSS feeds for users, based on their interests. </li>
<li>A social bookmarking tool integrated in with the library system.</li>
<li>Our Intranet is made up solely of 2.0 tools &#8211; blogs for communication and wikis for collaboration.</li>
<li>A blog that only the librarians see, where we post kudos to each other, announcements and links to interesting Web sites.</li>
<li>I was asked for my bookmarks so many times that I turned it into a del.icio.us catalogue.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>4. Can you comment on any issues you might have had while implementing these tools? e.g.: firewall issues, staff buy-in, etc.</strong><br />
The responses to this question didn&#8217;t really surprise me. Implementation problems fell squarely into four categories: little/no staff buy-in, firewall/security issues, other IT/computing issues, and corporate issues (many of the responses below will flesh out these categories). What did surprise me was the absolute unwillingness of many IT departments to <em>budge</em> on the implementation of a lot of these technologies. I guess I&#8217;ve become really used to the academic environment, where almost anything is saleable if it&#8217;s put in the context of user needs or the user experience, not to mention the fact that research environments are quite different from for-profit environments (we have far fewer trade secrets to protect!). The discussion that followed the panel (where I presented the results of this survey; it was a local SLA chapter) unfortunately reinforced a lot of what I heard from survey respondents. At one point during the session, I suggested to an attendee that something like <a href="http://feed2js.org/">Feed2JS</a> might be a solution for syndicating their blog headlines on other company web pages since they can host their own version of the script &#038; accompanying files, and as soon as I breathed the words &#8220;upload to your own server&#8221;, I was met with jeering laughter from some members of the audience (and a panelist!)! Why the jeering laughter? Because the thought of asking their IT departments to load anything on a server was beyond outrageous to them! A dire situation, indeed. Anyway, here&#8217;s a sampling of the survey responses I received:</p>
<ul>
<li>For some I have to do more hand holding than others to set up RSS feeds</li>
<li>Hard to get our group to post to the blog or even to read it!</li>
<li>Admin didn&#8217;t see the use of blogs/RSS until I signed up my supervisor to Bloglines and made Bloglines her browser home page.</li>
<li>Staff buy-in has been the hardest. They don&#8217;t see the need for the blog.</li>
<li>library staff who I am hoping will blog don&#8217;t &#8220;get it&#8221;. They want to know why they would want to keep a journal, and don&#8217;t realize this is actually a good tool for current awareness.</li>
<li>It&#8217;s hard to get people to write for the blog on the public site. Our intranet, however, is thriving with new additions all the time.</li>
<li>Our blog and the RSS feeds from our portal are inside the firewall, so you can&#8217;t use a reader like Bloglines which is easier to explain and promote than some of the desktop readers. </li>
<li>Firewall issues are huge!</li>
<li>Our IT staff is very open so we did not have firewall issues.</li>
<li>I want to incorporate blogging inside the firewall but tech people don&#8217;t know how to set it up.</li>
<li>IT don’t want to cooperate.</li>
<li>our parent institution blocks IM.</li>
<li>Enterprise-wide web page &#8220;look and feel&#8221; requirements make it difficult to use off-the-shelf web-based wiki and blogging tools.</li>
<li>Dysfunctional, backwards-focused centralized IT group … enforce so many restrictions that it is pretty much impossible to truly move into a Web 2.0 delivery model.</li>
<li>IT department stifles any sort of new technologies. </li>
<li>Requires a CMS for the intranet pages. CMS does not allow for wikis or blogs. </li>
<li>IT department has really put the hammer down on any multimedia things such as instant messaging or view podcasts. </li>
<li>IT&#8217;s reluctance to adopt new technologies out of fear as to what it will do to their system is our biggest problem.</li>
</ul>
<p>The question with which I wrapped up my presentation was, <strong>how can we deal with these barriers to implementation and move forward</strong>? Some ideas we came up with:</p>
<ul>
<li>identify the &#8220;low-hanging fruit&#8221;: pick the technologies that are the easiest to implement &amp; use, and get your colleagues (and manager) hooked!</li>
<li>some admitted that they operate under an &#8220;ask for forgiveness, not permission&#8221; MO &#8211; do as much as you can without having to involve the IT department (which isn&#8217;t difficult to do with many 2.0 tools &#8211; free, web-based versions of these tools make it easy to take the reigns and try them out).</li>
<li>while it might not seem to be the case, the management/staff buy-in issue is bigger than the IT issues. Why? Because once you have buy-in (particularly from management), there isn&#8217;t much IT can do to block your ideas/projects. </li>
</ul>
<p>If you have any other ideas for how to get past these implementation barriers, leave a comment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blogwithoutalibrary.net/251/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>tap tap, is this thing on?</title>
		<link>http://www.blogwithoutalibrary.net/246</link>
		<comments>http://www.blogwithoutalibrary.net/246#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 21:38:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ae-j</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[op-ed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speciallibrary2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[survey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogwithoutalibrary.net/?p=246</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you to all who have filled in the special library 2.0 survey, from the quick glance I had at the responses, I&#8217;m already noticing some interesting trends. The survey is still up and will be for a few more days, so if any special library types out there haven&#8217;t filled it in yet, please [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you to all who have filled in <a href="http://www.blogwithoutalibrary.net/?p=236"><strong>the special library 2.0 survey</strong></a>, from the quick glance I had at the responses, I&#8217;m already noticing some interesting trends. </p>
<p>The survey is still up and will be for a few more days, so if any special library types out there haven&#8217;t filled it in yet, <a href="http://www.blogwithoutalibrary.net/?p=236">please do</a>! And tell your friends! And your listservs! And your blog-readers! (thank you!)</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll be pulling the data together towards the end of next week and will report back here when I do. Anticipate!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blogwithoutalibrary.net/246/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>calling all special librarians!</title>
		<link>http://www.blogwithoutalibrary.net/236</link>
		<comments>http://www.blogwithoutalibrary.net/236#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Nov 2006 16:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ae-j</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[op-ed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speciallibrary2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[survey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogwithoutalibrary.net/?p=236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m going to be on an SLA panel in a couple of weeks to talk about Library 2.0. While I already have a few examples of how special libraries are using 2.0 tools (culled mostly from recent conversations at Internet Librarian &#8212; special librarians are doing amazing things!), I thought it would be nice to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going to be on an <acronym title="Special Libraries Association">SLA</acronym> panel in a couple of weeks to talk about Library 2.0. While I already have a few examples of how special libraries are using 2.0 tools (culled mostly from recent conversations at Internet Librarian &#8212; special librarians are doing amazing things!), I thought it would be nice to do a little survey to give more of you a chance to tell us how you&#8217;re using these tools. SO, if you:</p>
<ul>
<li>work in a corporate, government, law, hospital, association, or ANY special library</li>
<li>use 2.0 tools (blogs, rss, wikis, IM, etc.) in your library</li>
</ul>
<p>do me a favour and complete <a href="http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.asp?u=663962805264"><strong>this short survey</strong></a>, would you? For anyone who&#8217;s interested in the results, I&#8217;ll report back in a couple of weeks so stay tuned! </p>
<p>And, thanks in advance!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blogwithoutalibrary.net/236/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

