wikified
Over the past few months, I’ve been debating the future of the list of blogging libraries I maintain on this site. For me, the two crucial questions that needed answering were: is the list still valuable and are people using it? Just as I was about to pose those questions here, I received a small flurry of messages from various corners of the biblioblogosphere about the ways in which the list was being used (I think it was just before CiL/PLA, when speakers were preparing their presentations), so I thought, “good”. In truth, the future of the blogging libraries list wasn’t ever in too much jeopardy since it continues to be a useful resource for my own presentations & courses, so I probably would have continued to maintain it, if only for selfish reasons, but it was nice to hear that others got some use out of it too.
So, once that was settled, my next consideration was: how can I make the list more self-sustaining? At the moment, people still have to email me their link to get their library blog on the list (so 1.0!) — how could I set it up so that people could add their links themselves and still not lose functionality (categorization and RSS being the two most important features in my book)? If you’re thinking “wiki”, you’re right! Say hello to the new Blogging Libraries Wiki. While there is still some tweaking to be done over the next few days (navigation, about page, help page, etc.), all the links have been transferred from the old blogrolling lists, so it’s fully up to date. And I’ve posted a note on the old page so if you’ve linked to that page, your link won’t be totally broken.
A few details about the wiki:
- it’s a MediaWiki wiki which was super easy to install, thanks to Dreamhost, my domain host. Dreamhost does one-click installs & upgrades of all sorts of goodies (WordPress too), so it was a painless process. The customization took a bit more figuring out, but thanks to the excellent documentation, that was relatively painless too.
- right now, the category pages are wide open for anyone to edit. I thought I’d start out that way and monitor the spam/vandalism level before considering login-only edits. Ideally, I’d like to stick with open editing so as to not discourage potential posters from adding their links (the fewer barriers to participation, the better!), but I’m realistic. We’ll see.
9 Comments