wherein the author asks her readers to provide the answer to the ultimate VR question
We did an IM reference pilot @ my library this summer. It went something like this:
- launched June 6th, wrapped up August 5th;
- set up handles through AIM, MSN, Yahoo!, and ICQ;
- provided IM reference 11am-3pm, Monday-Friday;
- had 9 project participants doing IM (one at a time) from their computers & the reference desk computers (depending on how the schedule worked out) using Trillian;
- received an average of 2 questions per week (but tried not to feel discouraged about the number given that it was the summer, after all);
- received 100% positive feedback from users, zero negative feedback;
- took a LOT of getting used to on the part of the IM reference librarian;
- did very little PR for the pilot: Web page, added info on the service to our e-mail signatures (we do a rigourous email reference business), added online status buttons to our Web page (wanted to add them to our home page; couldn’t on account of the icons not being on our server and, therefore, our homepage being proxied in the library. Not cool. Must figure out way to get around this;), and post on our library blog.
Right now, I’m doing a bit of a post-mortem of the project and trying to come up with some recommendations (I love this one). Right off the bat, I can say that we will probably launch an ongoing service in the Fall. Also right off the bat, I can say that the service will be well used and students will probably love having the ability to IM us rather than just calling or e-mailing us. And, finally, right off the bat, I can tell you that the most difficult thing for us is going to be the logistics of staffing. I’ve been trawling the VR literature for staffing models used in regular ol’ virtual reference, to, you know, call upon best practices and engage in a bit of evidence-based librarianship. But, I am having no luck.
So, tell me, how do you staff your VR service (IM, chat, whatever)?
5 Comments